Yesterday had a theme to it, though not evident until the end of the day, when B pointed it out to me...
We drove into the center of town to finish our tour of the KAMPF IN DER STADT exhibit at the Wien Museum. The exhibit explains the conditions which led up to the Austrian civil war in 1934.
If you click on the link and read about the civil war, you might notice parallels between conditions in Austria in the 20s and 30s, and conditions in the US today. It was city versus country, conservative versus socialist, rich versus working people, religious versus secular. Tough economic circumstances led to great concern over the future, which led to the rise of "leaders" who had "good ideas" about how best to proceed, which led to attempts to suppress and repress various groups of people, which led to marching in the streets, occasional riots, and then a brief civil war.
I'm not the kind of guy who actually starts sentences with the phrase "There are two kinds of people:" but it does seem that there are people who 1) want things to stay the same, or go backwards, even if it means continued discomfort and uptightness, and 2) people who want change and progress, even if it means discomfort and a "leaving behind" of cherished but now outdated modes of thinking, during the transformation.
In America, we've got the Sarah Palin types, and we've got the Ralph Nader types. And there's a broad range of in-between types.
In America, the Right tend to be the people with the guns who don't mind getting in the opposition's faces, while the Left tends to be basically uninterested in and incapable of actual tough fighting. It's somewhat the opposite in Europe, where the Left can be pretty noisy and demonstrative and willing to out-shout the loudmouths on the Right and actually tell them, to their faces, "You are loud, uneducated bullies with stupid, backward ideas." (They don't always win but they're willing to fight, unlike the American Left. Which is why the American Left gets no respect from the Right, and often gets their asses steamrolled by the Right.)
For me, though, I'm like my buddy George the Greek. We think political storms are like actual storms. They come up, you try to ride them out as best you can, and you can forget about trying to control them. This shit has been going on since the beginning of history. It ain't changing any time soon.
----
Went to the movies after the museum. Woody Allen's WHATEVER WORKS, with Larry David playing a more misanthropic, embittered, and obnoxious Woody Allen figure. The movie paralleled the museum exhibit in that it showcased differences between big-city, well-educated, politically / socially liberal, atheistic people and relatively uneducated, religious, conservative, small-town Southerners.
I'm not taking sides one way or the other, but in recent political campaigns the ideal of small-town America was constantly upheld as some sort of mythical holy state of being, when in fact the majority of Americans in the 21st Century live in large cities, with more and more people moving to the cities every year. Why politicians continue to pretend to worry about what small-town people think and believe is quite beyond my comprehension.
The film was entertaining in its own right, aside from any deeper social or political concepts the viewer might want to plug into the story. It's out on DVD in the States; you can get it from Netflix and other rental outlets.
Monday, December 28, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
J,
Politicians continue to pander to the 'small town' American because, deep inside most Americans still like to think of themselves as having those small town, Leave It To Beaver values.
What neither the politician nor the people to which they are pandering want to admit is Leave It To Beaver values are a fantasy ideal that never existed except in Norman Rockwell paintings, the movies (Andy Hardy) and on TV. So they delude themselves into believing they still maintain those values, even if they never actually had them!
BTW: 14.1 inches of show really sucks balls here in OK.
:)
Have a Happy New Year!
Mod
P.S. It's a Wonderful Life contributes to the small town ideal, also a fantasy. The reality would be more like the SNL alternate ending. (It should be on Youtube if you've never seen it.)
Actually, try Hulu
http://www.hulu.com/watch/4267/saturday-night-live-its-a-wonderful-life-lost-ending
;)
Mod
"It's a Wonderful Life" has very strong socialist and anti-capitalist overtones - I've always found it intriguing a movie that could easily have been produced by any communist propaganda division (ok, except for the angel bit) would be America's all-time favourite at Christmas!
Happy New Year!
B.
B,
Maybe that's the reason IAWL didn't initially do well in the post WWII, anti-commie USA?
But there are other films in Capra's canon that are much stronger representations of your point. If you haven't already, look at Meet John Doe, You Can't Take It With You and Mr. Deeds Goes To Town.
:)
Post a Comment